There
is a real attraction in writing novels that are ‘more of the same’. Think of
Catherine Cookson and you know exactly what you are going to get. It’s good for
the publisher and good for the writer because they know there is a market ready
to be exploited. And the reader can be sure of what she/he is buying. In short,
it’s good marketing practice.
But
it’s also like setting up a cafe in which every item on the menu is just like
every other. There’s no variety. The customer can order any meal at all and it
will look and taste very similar. That might suit some diners, but not all.
I
wrote three books which I call my Hampton Warlock trilogy. The main characters
in each novel live in the same small Dorset village. (see www.thenovelsofdavidhough.com) But the stories differ from one another in
almost every aspect. That was deliberate. I don’t want people to think of me as
a one-genre writer. I want my readers to experience different emotions within
the trilogy: sometimes thrilling
excitement, sometimes compassion, sometimes romantic joy, sometimes anger at
the behaviour of the villains. My key characters differ radically: the girl searching for her ancestry, the
priest who left the church, the husband whose wife holds a terrible secret.
Their only link is the village they call home. And the plots differ. One is
centred on the history of conflict between England and Ireland. Another tells
the tale of a child given up for adoption. The third explores the Second World
War and its lasting effects through the experiences of one family.
So,
which do you opt for? More of the same, or variety? In my view, there is room
for both policies, but I prefer a touch of variety. Maybe I’ve been lucky in
that none of my publishers have asked me for more of the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment